Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 17.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $13.20 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.1% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), BIG-Bench Hard (93.1%), HumanEval (92.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-06-21
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Bedrock