Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 2.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 168.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $85.20 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Claude Opus 4.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 13 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Claude Opus 4.1
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval