Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4 leads with 2.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $85.20 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (88.8%), TAU-bench Retail (81.4%), GPQA (79.6%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Claude Opus 4
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Claude Opus 4
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Claude Opus 4
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval