+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Command R+
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 6.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Command R+. Command R+ is $3.55 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input:$0.80
Output:$4.00
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($3.55 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:36.5%(+6.6%)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:29.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:36.5%(+6.6%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:29.8%
Providers:2