Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads with 18.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-R1-0528. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is $2.15 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU-Redux (93.4%), SimpleQA (92.3%), AIME 2024 (91.4%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Novita