+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 21.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.5% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (93.9%), AIME 2024 (80.0%), GPQA (59.1%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:45.6%(+21.8%)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Average Score:23.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:45.6%(+21.8%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Avg Score:23.8%
Providers:0