+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek-V2.5
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V2.5 leads with 24.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 383.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V2.5. DeepSeek-V2.5 is $4.38 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, DeepSeek-V2.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.1% across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.1%), MT-Bench (90.2%), HumanEval (89.0%). The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek
2024-05-08
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input:$0.80
Output:$4.00
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input:$0.14
Output:$0.28($4.38 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:26.1%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Average Score:50.8%(+24.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:26.1%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Avg Score:50.8%(+24.7%)
Providers:3