Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3 leads with 31.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3. DeepSeek-V3 is $3.43 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.2% across 20 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DROP (91.6%), CLUEWSC (90.9%), MATH-500 (90.2%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek
2024-12-25
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek-V3
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 25 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek-V3
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek-V3
Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek