Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 16.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 72.3K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3 0324. DeepSeek-V3 0324 is $3.38 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.4% across 5 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.0%), MMLU-Pro (81.2%), GPQA (68.4%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
DeepSeek-V3 0324
DeepSeek
2025-03-25
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek-V3 0324
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Novita