Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 leads with 19.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 141.4K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek VL2. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $4804.70 cheaper per million tokens. DeepSeek VL2 supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.9% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (93.3%), ChartQA (86.0%), TextVQA (84.2%). It supports a 259K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek VL2
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek VL2
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek VL2
Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek VL2
Replicate