+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny leads with 14.6% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:23.8%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:38.4%(+14.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:23.8%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:38.4%(+14.6%)
Providers:0