Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 54.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Devstral Small 1.1. Devstral Small 1.1 is $4.40 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Mistral AI
Devstral Small 1.1 is a language model developed by Mistral AI. The model shows competitive results across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (53.6%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Devstral Small 1.1
Mistral AI
2025-07-11
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Devstral Small 1.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Devstral Small 1.1
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Devstral Small 1.1
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Devstral Small 1.1
Devstral Small 1.1
Mistral AI