Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 7.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 359.0K more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.0 Pro. Gemini 1.0 Pro is $2.80 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemini 1.0 Pro is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 9 benchmarks. Notable strengths include BIG-Bench (75.0%), MMLU (71.8%), WMT23 (71.7%). The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Gemini 1.0 Pro