Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 11.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 656.8K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Haiku. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $4.43 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH (86.8%), FACTS Grounding (83.6%), Global-MMLU-Lite (78.2%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite