+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 29.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.3% across 3 benchmarks. Notable strengths include MMMU (75.4%), GPQA (74.2%), AIME 2024 (73.3%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:49.7%(+29.5%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:20.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:49.7%(+29.5%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:20.3%
Providers:0