+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 15.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 714.1K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Haiku. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $2.00 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Global-MMLU-Lite (88.4%), AIME 2024 (88.0%), FACTS Grounding (85.3%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input:$0.80
Output:$4.00
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input:$0.30
Output:$2.50($2.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:26.1%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:41.6%(+15.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:26.1%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:41.6%(+15.6%)
Providers:2