Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 714.1K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Haiku. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is $4.30 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FACTS Grounding (84.1%), Global-MMLU-Lite (81.1%), MMMU (72.9%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite