Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 24.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 714.1K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Haiku. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $6.45 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.6% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MRCR (93.0%), AIME 2024 (92.0%), Global-MMLU-Lite (88.6%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
ZeroEval