+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemma 2 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 24.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:23.8%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:48.1%(+24.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:23.8%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:48.1%(+24.3%)
Providers:0