Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 37.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B is $4.50 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemma 3 27B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), IFEval (90.4%), MATH (89.0%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemma 3 27B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 31 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemma 3 27B
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemma 3 27B
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemma 3 27B
Gemma 3 27B
DeepInfra
Novita