Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed leads with 9.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 336.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $55.20 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. Notable strengths include HumanEval (75.0%), MGSM (67.0%), MMLU (64.9%). The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Together