+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-3.5 Turbo
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 17.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 379.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo. GPT-3.5 Turbo is $2.80 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 8 benchmarks. Notable strengths include DROP (70.2%), MMLU (69.8%), HumanEval (68.0%). The model is available through 2 API providers.
1 year newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input:$0.80
Output:$4.00
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50($2.80 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:45.6%(+17.4%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:28.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:45.6%(+17.4%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:28.2%
Providers:2