Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 leads with 24.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 334.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-4. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $85.20 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT-4 is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 77.7% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) (96.3%), HellaSwag (95.3%), Uniform Bar Exam (90.0%). The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly.
1 year newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4
GPT-4
2022-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4
GPT-4
Azure
OpenAI