Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 7.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 267.9K more tokens in context window than GPT-4 Turbo. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $35.20 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 78.1% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MGSM (88.5%), HumanEval (87.1%), MMLU (86.5%). It supports a 132K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
2024-04-09
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4 Turbo
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 10 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4 Turbo
GPT-4 Turbo
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4 Turbo
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4 Turbo
GPT-4 Turbo
Azure
OpenAI