Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 leads with 33.0% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 offers 680.3K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Haiku. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $5.20 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, GPT-4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 30 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.2%), CharXiv-D (87.9%), IFEval (87.4%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
GPT-4.1
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 35 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4.1
GPT-4.1
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4.1
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4.1
GPT-4.1
OpenAI