Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 6.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 267.9K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $7.70 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT-4o is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 77.4% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MGSM (90.5%), HumanEval (90.2%), MMLU (88.7%). It supports a 132K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-05-13
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4o
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4o
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4o
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4o
GPT-4o
Azure
OpenAI