Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 8.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than GPT OSS 120B. GPT OSS 120B is $4.26 cheaper per million tokens. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.7% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.0%), CodeForces (87.4%), GPQA (80.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT OSS 120B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT OSS 120B
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT OSS 120B
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT OSS 120B
GPT OSS 120B
DeepInfra
Groq
Novita
OpenAI
ZeroEval