Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 12.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than GPT OSS 20B. GPT OSS 20B is $4.55 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT OSS 20B is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (85.3%), CodeForces (83.9%), GPQA (71.5%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
GPT OSS 20B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT OSS 20B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT OSS 20B
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT OSS 20B
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT OSS 20B
GPT OSS 20B
Groq
Novita
OpenAI
ZeroEval