+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Grok-1.5V
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 2.7% higher average benchmark score. Grok-1.5V supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-1.5V is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.9% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (88.3%), DocVQA (85.6%), TextVQA (78.1%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Grok-1.5V
xAI
2024-04-12
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:34.2%(+2.7%)
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Average Score:31.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:34.2%(+2.7%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Avg Score:31.4%
Providers:0