+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Grok-2 mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 mini leads with 3.5% higher average benchmark score. Grok-2 mini supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-2 mini is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (93.2%), MMLU (86.2%), HumanEval (85.7%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Grok-2 mini
xAI
2024-08-13
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 13 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:42.1%
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Average Score:45.6%(+3.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:42.1%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Avg Score:45.6%(+3.5%)
Providers:0