Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 7.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 136.0K more tokens in context window than Grok-4. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $13.20 cheaper per million tokens. Grok-4 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
xAI
Grok-4 is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (91.7%), HMMT25 (90.0%), GPQA (87.5%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Grok-4
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Grok-4
Grok-4
2024-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Grok-4
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Grok-4
Grok-4
xAI
ZeroEval