Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 52.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 134.0K more tokens in context window than Grok Code Fast 1. Grok Code Fast 1 is $3.10 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1 is a language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.8% across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (70.8%). It supports a 266K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
2025-08-28
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Grok Code Fast 1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Grok Code Fast 1
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Grok Code Fast 1
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Grok Code Fast 1
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI