Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 1.6% higher average benchmark score. Jamba 1.5 Large offers 112.0K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Haiku. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $5.20 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large is a language model developed by AI21 Labs. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.5% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (93.0%), GSM8k (87.0%), MMLU (81.2%). It supports a 512K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents AI21 Labs's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Large
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Jamba 1.5 Large
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Jamba 1.5 Large
Jamba 1.5 Large
2024-03-05
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Jamba 1.5 Large
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Jamba 1.5 Large
Jamba 1.5 Large
Bedrock