Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 3.9% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 0905 offers 124.3K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Haiku. Kimi K2 0905 is $1.70 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905 is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.0% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (94.5%), MMLU (90.2%), MATH (89.1%). It supports a 524K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Kimi K2 0905
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Kimi K2 0905
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Kimi K2 0905
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Kimi K2 0905
Kimi K2 0905
Novita
ZeroEval