+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 leads with 37.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.1% across 29 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.4%), MMLU-Redux (92.7%), IFEval (89.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 34 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:16.1%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Average Score:53.3%(+37.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:16.1%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Avg Score:53.3%(+37.2%)
Providers:0