Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct leads with 39.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 405B Instruct. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is $3.02 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on 8 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (96.9%), GSM8k (96.8%), API-Bank (92.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 8 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Replicate
Together