Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct leads with 20.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is $4.05 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.3% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (92.3%), DocVQA (90.1%), MGSM (86.9%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
27 days newer
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Together