+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs MedGemma 4B IT
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 8.6% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:34.2%(+8.6%)
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:25.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:34.2%(+8.6%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:25.6%
Providers:0