Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 19.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is $4.40 cheaper per million tokens. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is a multimodal language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.9% across 5 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (81.0%), TriviaQA (80.5%), MMMU (59.3%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI