+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 8.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 206.5K more tokens in context window than o1-mini. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $10.20 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.9% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (92.4%), MATH-500 (90.0%), MMLU (85.2%). It supports a 194K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input:$0.80
Output:$4.00($10.20 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Input:$3.00
Output:$12.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 13 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:42.1%(+8.9%)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:33.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:42.1%(+8.9%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:33.2%
Providers:2