+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs o1-pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 38.2% higher average benchmark score. o1-pro supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-pro is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 82.5% across 2 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2024 (86.0%), GPQA (79.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
o1-pro
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 10 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:54.7%(+38.2%)
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Average Score:16.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o1-pro
2023-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:54.7%(+38.2%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Avg Score:16.5%
Providers:0