Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 32.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 100.0K more tokens in context window than o3. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $5.20 cheaper per million tokens. o3 supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
o3 is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.5% across 22 benchmarks. It excels particularly in COLLIE (98.4%), AIME 2024 (91.6%), ARC-AGI (88.0%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
o3
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 29 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
o3
o3
2024-05-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
o3
Claude 3.5 Haiku
o3
o3
OpenAI