+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs QvQ-72B-Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 26.9% higher average benchmark score. QvQ-72B-Preview supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview is a multimodal language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The model shows competitive results across 4 benchmarks. Notable strengths include MathVista (71.4%), MMMU (70.3%), MathVision (35.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
QvQ-72B-Preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-12-25
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 13 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:42.1%(+26.9%)
+
+
+
+
QvQ-72B-Preview
Average Score:15.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:42.1%(+26.9%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
QvQ-72B-Preview
Avg Score:15.2%
Providers:0