Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads with 28.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 260.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is $4.05 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 77.4% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.8%), MT-Bench (93.5%), MBPP (88.2%). It supports a 139K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Together