+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen2 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2 7B Instruct leads with 15.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen2 7B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 7B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The model shows competitive results across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MT-Bench (84.1%), GSM8k (82.3%), HumanEval (79.9%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Qwen2 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-07-23
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:28.8%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 7B Instruct
Average Score:43.9%(+15.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:28.8%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 7B Instruct
Avg Score:43.9%(+15.1%)
Providers:0