+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B leads with 42.4% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is a multimodal language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The model shows competitive results across 45 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (95.2%), VocalSound (93.9%), GSM8k (88.7%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-27
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 50 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:10.9%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Average Score:53.3%(+42.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:10.9%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Avg Score:53.3%(+42.4%)
Providers:0