+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct leads with 37.4% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.9% across 30 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (96.4%), Android Control Low_EM (93.7%), ChartQA (89.5%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-01-26
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 39 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:14.0%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Average Score:51.5%(+37.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:14.0%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Avg Score:51.5%(+37.4%)
Providers:0