Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 32B leads with 5.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 32B. Qwen3 32B is $4.40 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Qwen3 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.0% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Arena Hard (93.8%), AIME 2024 (81.4%), LiveBench (74.9%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Qwen3 32B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Qwen3 32B
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Qwen3 32B
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Qwen3 32B
Qwen3 32B
DeepInfra
Novita
Sambanova