+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs QwQ-32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 1.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (90.6%), IFEval (83.9%), AIME 2024 (79.5%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Average Score:36.5%(+1.7%)
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Average Score:34.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
QwQ-32B
2024-11-28
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Avg Score:36.5%(+1.7%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Avg Score:34.8%
Providers:0