Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads with 24.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 334.5K more tokens in context window than QwQ-32B-Preview. QwQ-32B-Preview is $4.45 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (90.6%), GPQA (65.2%), AIME 2024 (50.0%). The model is available through 4 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-10-22
QwQ-32B-Preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-11-28
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
QwQ-32B-Preview
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Haiku
QwQ-32B-Preview
QwQ-32B-Preview
2024-11-28
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Haiku
QwQ-32B-Preview
Claude 3.5 Haiku
QwQ-32B-Preview
QwQ-32B-Preview
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Together